Changeset 2386

Show
Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/21/04 18:28:36 (10 years ago)
Author:
khali
Message:

Drop out-of-date comment about semi-static allocation.

Location:
lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips
Files:
8 modified

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/adm1021.c

    r2068 r2386  
    178178}; 
    179179 
    180 /* I choose here for semi-static allocation. Complete dynamic 
    181    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    182    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    183180static int adm1021_id = 0; 
    184181 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/adm1024.c

    r2286 r2386  
    210210                        int ctl_name, int *nrels_mag, long *results); 
    211211 
    212 /* I choose here for semi-static ADM1024 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    213    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    214    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    215212static int adm1024_id = 0; 
    216213 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/adm1025.c

    r2286 r2386  
    157157                        int ctl_name, int *nrels_mag, long *results); 
    158158 
    159 /* I choose here for semi-static ADM1025 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    160    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    161    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    162159static int adm1025_id = 0; 
    163160 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/adm9240.c

    r2286 r2386  
    215215                        int ctl_name, int *nrels_mag, long *results); 
    216216 
    217 /* I choose here for semi-static ADM9240 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    218    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    219    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    220217static int adm9240_id = 0; 
    221218 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/gl520sm.c

    r2068 r2386  
    249249}; 
    250250 
    251 /* I choose here for semi-static GL520SM allocation. Complete dynamic 
    252    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    253    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    254251static int gl520_id = 0; 
    255252 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/lm87.c

    r2286 r2386  
    267267                        int ctl_name, int *nrels_mag, long *results); 
    268268 
    269 /* I choose here for semi-static LM87 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    270    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    271    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    272269static int lm87_id = 0; 
    273270 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/ltc1710.c

    r1705 r2386  
    120120}; 
    121121 
    122 /* I choose here for semi-static LTC1710 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    123    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    124    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    125122static int ltc1710_id = 0; 
    126123 
  • lm-sensors/trunk/kernel/chips/saa1064.c

    r1900 r2386  
    185185}; 
    186186 
    187 /* I choose here for semi-static SAA1064 allocation. Complete dynamic 
    188    allocation could also be used; the code needed for this would probably 
    189    take more memory than the datastructure takes now. */ 
    190187static int saa1064_id = 0; 
    191188